Running ITAM, SAM, SaaS and cloud management as four separate tools creates a reconciliation tax. What a genuine all-in-one platform has to deliver, and how to test a vendor claim before you buy.
Many enterprise IT teams run separate tools for ITAM, SAM, SaaS management and cloud cost management. An ITAM tool for the data centre. A SAM tool for licence compliance. A SaaS management platform for cloud apps. A cloud cost tool for AWS, Azure and GCP. Each has its own data model, its own console and its own renewal date.
The result is a reconciliation tax. Spreadsheets bridge the gaps. Audit responses take too long. Procurement runs renewals against incomplete spend data. And AI governance ends up somewhere else again.
For CIOs and IT directors, the question is what an all-in-one platform should actually deliver, why these domains belong together, and how to evaluate the market without buying a bloated bundle.
Key takeaways
Tool sprawl is part of the cost problem. Many large enterprises pay for separate tools covering ITAM, SAM, SaaS, cloud and access visibility. The combined licence, integration and operational costs can wipe out the savings these programmes are meant to deliver.
Audits and assurance demand a single picture. Software audits, security reviews and AI governance all require overlapping evidence about software, users and deployment. If that evidence is spread across four tools, your audit response is slower and harder to defend.
AI governance crosses every domain. AI capabilities appear inside approved SaaS applications, inside cloud-hosted services and inside licensed desktop software. A governance programme limited to one tool will miss most of what it is supposed to cover.
It does not mean one giant product that pretends to do everything equally well. Those rarely survive enterprise complexity.
A unified platform has to include:
The test is simple. Ask a cross-domain question — which SaaS applications are still assigned to users who have left the company? If the answer requires a spreadsheet export, it is not an all-in-one platform.
Every domain needs the same four pillars: Visibility, Optimization, Management and Governance. A platform deep on visibility but thin on governance is discovery with an invoice attached. You need all four pillars in every domain.
Hardware and software discovery, lifecycle management, asset ownership and CMDB integration. This is the foundation everything else reconciles against.
Licence compliance, optimisation and audit defence. A financial discipline that protects against unbudgeted audit exposure, including the licensing rules for the publishers that actually bite — Oracle, IBM and SAP.
Shadow SaaS discovery, Shadow AI detection, subscription optimisation and access governance. A fast-growing category, because decentralised app purchasing keeps growing. The prize is large: 46% of SaaS licences go unused, with the average organisation using just 54% of what it pays for.
Multi-cloud visibility, FinOps practice and cost optimisation across AWS, Azure, GCP and the rest.
Models, experiments, GPU fleets and AI seats. This is the domain most often left in a spreadsheet, and it is the one growing fastest.
These domains share the same underlying objects: users, publishers, applications and spend. Running them as separate tools means maintaining separate records of the same thing, then arguing about which record is right.
CerteroX is one platform with purpose-built products for each discipline, running the same four pillars across all of them.
Certero was recognised as the sole Customers’ Choice in the 2024 Gartner® Peer Insights™ Voice of the Customer for Software Asset Management Tools.
Use this as your shortlist filter.
Inventory the tools you already run, then define the cross-domain questions you actually need answered. Then ask one of those questions of each shortlisted vendor, live, and watch how many systems the answer has to come from. That is the only way to test a shared data model claim rather than take it on trust.
When you are ready to scope an evaluation, talk to us.
It depends on the depth of the modules. A genuinely deep platform delivers cross-domain visibility that point tools cannot. A shallow bundle gives you the worst of both. The test is in the data model, not the marketing.
Shadow AI shows up inside SaaS applications, on cloud workloads and as standalone tools. A unified platform sees all three surfaces from one connected view. In CerteroX, AI tools are classified from application feature tags in the catalogue rather than a hardcoded list, so the detection set grows without waiting for a release.
No. CerteroX modules deploy in sequence. Most customers start where the pain is sharpest and add from there.
Both offer multi-module suites, and the criteria above apply equally to all of them. Ask a cross-domain question of each and check whether the answer comes back from one query or from a join you had to build yourself.
GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark, and PEER INSIGHTS is a trademark and service mark, of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates.
Other posts covering the same ground.
A practical evaluation guide for IT Asset Management platforms — what to test, what to ask vendors, and how to tell unified asset intelligence from a stitched-together toolset.
Five places Microsoft spend leaks — Microsoft 365 subscriptions, Windows Server Datacenter cores, Azure Hybrid Benefit, SQL Server editions and over-estimated Enterprise Agreements — and what it takes to close each one.
Most organisations run several asset management tools because they were bought one problem at a time. The cost is not the licences — it is that no two of them agree.
Everything argued above is checkable. Name the publisher, the billing account or the platform you would argue with, and the session is built around it — the reasoning attached, not a summary slide.
No gated download at the end of it.